Strange phenomenons.

After I laid out my Home Web Page I have received much new materials from researchers who have expressed their excitement about the work I am doing. It can take some time to go through and present all this. New approaches arise that might make it necessary to change some details, but largely it is surprising how many pieces support my theory, and fall into place.

Little by little we have found out that as time has passed there have been different kind of catastrophes that has changed the environment as well as the animal life . I would like to shed some light on this, mostly by finds of fossils, changes in development etc.

When I put forth my own theories in connection with this, I hope that the would be readers will forgive me for this; as much to come further in my research with what I have, without seeking a possible explanation. Part of this goes on intuition, which was the reason I started with this investigation in the first place. Most of it is, in any case, tied up and supported by scientific finds and data from serious researchers. When that is said, we shall look closer on the material received regarding fossils and finds as a background to my theory of the continents placement during the time when these were laying together.

Everything I find points to that there must have been a collision from above with one or another body that have divided the continents in its time.

This is confirmed by researchers I have had contact with. Something like this is just what can have brought so much confusion in circles of researchers and circumstantial evidences that are basis for Wegener's theories can loose its background of such a disaster. But first the fossils.  

Answer to another mystery?

In 1946 there were found the oldest fossils of an ocean animal in the Ediacara Hills in Southern Australia. (fig.1)

 

Fig. 1
This is Ediacaria Flindersi, one of the over 100 species from the time of the Precambrian.

http://www.geol.queensu.ca/museum/exhibits/ediac/ediac.html

 

These fossils that had the forms of jellyfish, weird worms and coral animals, lived about 545 million years ago. They were called "Ediacara Biota", from the place they were found. They are known from about 25 different places, and from five different continents around the world, and comprise abut 100 different species. The fossils are imprints from soft animals and often appear in connection with a conglomeration of (tillitts, fossils moraines, sand pebbles, and ricks that have been moved), that show the all encompassing ice age at the time when they lived according to the scientific society.  

The place for these findings were The Mackenzie mountains in North-western areas of Canada, Yukon, British Columbia and Newfoundland.

Similar type of fossils were also found close to the farm "Swartpunt" in South Namibia in Africa and by the white sea in Russia. Searches have been made in large areas with similar rock types around the earth, but without finding a least bit of evidence of any similar animal life from the "Precambrian age", even though they ought to be found there.. This has been a mysterious for Palaeontologists up to our time. If we, instead, look on the model I have worked out, we may be close to finding an answer to this mystery. 

While we localize the different finding areas on Wegener's model, we see them appearing all over his collection of continental masses. (fig.2) 

 

Fig. 2

Here are the discovery areas for Ediacara Fossils marked in red. We see they are spread over the whole continent.

These lived in ice covered ocean areas and the researchers have out from this, based their conclusions that most of the land on the continents was covered with ice. We also see that we find most of the discovery areas over most of the continents without any kind of explanation of how the fossils wound up there. How would this look if we drew in the same discovery areas on my model?

 

The explanation I have received is that these ocean animals were so far inland in this continent due to the fact that the ocean reached considerable higher than what it does today. This I strongly disagree with on the basis of the latest Ice age. so much of the ocean was as ice on the land at this time, that the level of the ocean was up to 150 meters lower than it is today. According to the Scientists, the Ice Age was even more comprehensive at the time these ocean animals lived . This ought then to mean that the ocean level should be even lower than at the last Ice Age, if indeed there was such a global Ice Age as is claimed here. In which case an Ice Age like this must have occurred by a hit like I point to when the dust clouds would have darkened the earth.

If we look at my model we find the same animal species in the ocean areas that lies north of the continents by Equator. (fig.3)

Sources:

Here it ought to be completely un-necessary to comment on anything at all, because the discovery areas largely form a half circle over the continents tell much if we only take the time to study this map closely. also when we localize the ocean floor areas high up in the mountains around the world. I might add that the discovery areas in Canada are up in the high mountains and around all of Europe/Russia there are lowlands from the Baltic sea and in towards these discovery areas.

 

Under the light area in the Arctic Ocean we find the large groove that is called the Canada - pool. The lighter areas over South America is ocean floor which has set down the older rock species. We actually find the same in large areas of Siberia as well, and there are traces of this in Southern Scotland, Greenland and on Finse in Norway.

 

By a closer look at other organisms from this first era, we notice that these also are found in this ocean. Also later, ocean creatures like the Trilobites tell their own history about the evolution of these animals. The species Fallotopsis which is the oldest species we know of, can only be tied to this ocean in the north. They are only found in the northern parts of Europe and Canada. Why? Life started In The Oceans on the Northern Hemisphere.

On the enclosed maps I have drawn in the areas of findings of the fossils called Ediacara Biota which were the first soft animals found in the ocean. These were first found in Ediacara Hills in Australia in 1946. and later throughout large areas of the world. The fossils were some kind of nettle (jellyfish), worms and stem like animal species. These animals lived in the time of the Precambrian era that started from 3.9 billion years ago, and lasted to 600 million years ago. In comparison the dinosaurs came about 200 million years ago, 400 million years after these ocean animals were extinct.

Ben Waggoner, one of the researchers in USA who have studied these types of fossils closer recently sent me this more informative list of findings places:

“Major localities: (several well-preserved taxa). 
Ediacara Hills, south Australia. 
White Sea coast, north Russia (several sites). 
Olenek Uplift, near mouth of Lena River, Siberia. 
Mistaken Point, Newfoundland, Canada. 
Nama Group outcrops, Namibia.
Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada. 
Charnwood Forest, England. 
Dniestr River, Podolia region on Moldova border, Ukraine. 
(main locality now underwater thanks to hydroelectric plant). 

Minor localities: (one or a few taxa, mostly "medusoids"). 
Central and southern Ural Mountains, Russia(several sites). 
Central Australia near Alice Springs (several sites). 
Death Valley and areas south and east, California-Nevada, 
USA. 
Surrey County, North Carolina, USA. 
Tanafjorden, Finnmark, Norway. 
South China (several localities). 
Western Australia (I forget where). 
Southwest Brazil and northern Argentina .
Central Antarctica .
Rocky Mountains, British Columbia, Canada. 
West Africa (I forget where).” 

I have drawn in these areas of findings on my model, and I have to admit, I was very surprised and wildly enthusiastic as one by one I localized these "find-areas".
Notice how these areas form a nice and even arch across the continents. (fig.3)  

As the reader might notice, there were not many of these fossils found in the south seas, aside form a place near the Gulf Of Mexico. These might have been washed across North America, or the continents have been pressed down towards the inner parts of the earth. Looking at the way this half circle creates, I can't get myself to believe completely in this last mentioned possibility. It is difficult to picture that the Rocky Mountains which today rise more than 4000 meters above the ocean and consists of the oldest of species of rocks, actually has been laying under the ocean after it has been a land area. 

This is the way it is other places around the same sea, that I have placed on the northern Hemisphere. Discoveries of ocean floor articles on top of the Norwegian mountains, which is among the oldest rock species on earth, indicates this. At Finse we find something that might be an indication of a hit like I point to in the Arctic Ocean. We can find corresponding articles in Southern Scotland, Greenland and in Siberia.  Should all of these areas first arise out of the ocean and thereafter sink back down again under the ocean, in the same funny way, where we turn and roll the world around in order to explain the Ice age? This is, in spite of everything else, old species of rock on a "floating" plate of land that has been covered by ocean floor. It becomes easier to explain this whole theory then, by saying that the ocean floor has been thrown up into the mountains following or during a larger meteor landing.
 

From this we see that the areas would have made an equivalent half circle in the likeness of the Ediacara Biota Fossils. I am therefore forced to believe that there is a connection here since we find this clear pattern which make up a even line in a half circle and not anything else.

It will not, therefore come as a surprise if we also found corresponding fossils in the sedimentary rock species in South Scotland, Greenland and also on Finse in Norway that lies within, and also on this line.

It was probably this HIT that divided up all the smaller islands around Greenland's west coast, and also set the continental plates into action. It must also have been this happening that made the Ediacara Biota disappear, in that the Scientists claim that they were eliminated by some catastrophe about that time.

The Ocean animals were suddenly buried in sand.

This leads to the thought that something very drastic must have happened here. A terrible change that made these soft animals all of a sudden become buried in sand from the ocean floor. The researchers earlier believed that fossils such as these could not be found. due to the fact that these animals should not have had either tough skin nor hard shells, and according to their beliefs, couldn't become petrified wood or what we call fossils. 

No matter what kind of catastrophe that this has had to be, it has to have happened in the Arctic Ocean, north of Canada. By studying this bow of the discovery areas and using them as a starting guide, I see, as mentioned, that they form part of a circle. I have marked the centre with a lighter ocean area, and when I later study the ocean floor plates I find some huge depressions in the ocean floor, called Canada-pools. Perhaps this pool really emerged as a result of a asteroid or meteor hit?

When we then study this particular depression in the ocean floor, we see that the ocean floor act as a flat open space over the whole area. The position is much higher than otherwise around the world, as if the sand on the bottom of the ocean should have been pressed out to the sides and thereby raising itself in proportion to the ocean floor on the Southern Hemisphere. This can also eventually explain why there have been found left over ocean floor matter in the light blue areas that is integrated on the map. So, my conclusion is that these continents just have not been under the ocean as long as these ocean animals have lived.

The Earth must have been hit by meteors or asteroids up to several times after life was found on the earth. According to the Researchers such happening have occurred through all the ages of the history of the earth. The earth must have expanded as a result of these continual added materials . We have such an area around the Gulf of Mexico where researchers also conclude that there must have been a land area earlier. Scouring marks from ice confirm this theory. This kind of hit must in that case have happened some million years later, if I am to judge by the fossils that has been found on the East Coast of North America, and that is of newer date than Ediacara Biota. Otherwise the researchers must have dated the different forms of life in a wrong way.

Mystical Finds in the High Mountains.

When, by chance, fossils were found in The Rocky Mountains, there were a lot of these sea animals gathered in the same plate. These came there at the same time. The only possibility I can find for that many ocean animals of so many different kinds can be gathered like this, is that a great ocean wave was thrown up into the terrain in a mixture of sand and sea animals all mixed up. Thereafter this mixture gathered into the natural holes and bumps in the terrain, where the water then runs off and the sand covers this conglomeration of sea animals. In such a case it becomes natural that these soft animals was buried in sand before they dissolved , and this can then be the explanation why these animals are being found as fossils.

After this "catastrophe" something unusual, as mentioned before, happens. If we put my theory about the movements of the continents as a basis, the way I have explained it. The "catastrophe" that happened when this took place, broke up this belt of continents that stretched itself around the world. The two ocean areas on both sides of the land masses, that before was apart from each other, now meets by the way that Australia becomes separated from China.

The Oldest Discoveries of Fossils is done in China.

It is asserted today, also by professionals, that the oldest discoveries of these animals are found by China. Actually there was found fossils there of more advanced forms of life such as Trilobites and Crabs that didn't come about for quite many years after the ocean animals Ediacara Biota lived.

The teams of Researchers that discovered these fossils deny earlier dated materials of these forms of life. This article is really worth reading, if we want something to really think about. Click here.

As shown earlier, there is life in only one Ocean at first, but after the happening above there was life all over on both sides of the earlier connected belt of continents!

The Trilobites is a good example of this. It is today found over 10000 different kinds of them, and in Norway there have been found over 300 kinds. More are steadily found. This accident, or whatever I should call it, took its toll of life in the oceans. But, what is kind of strange, in spite of this, we now come into a time space where life in the oceans suddenly explode also in the Southern Hemisphere where it had seemed very dead earlier.... This can, by my estimation, only be explained by that the continents must have been divided up there and then.

Bad Counter-Argumentation.

I have several times tried to go into dialog with Geologists, but I am just about shown the door each time they hear the word "New Theory" or hear the word "Amateur Geologist". They usually look with half an eye at the maps I have drawn, and say that they are wrong without so much as giving me an explanation or a counter-argumentation. When I thereafter ask why this has to be wrong, the standard answer is:-"There are no signs of this Movement on the Pacific Ocean Plate." That ends the conversation and I dread the next time I meet a Geologist with this kind of negative attitude and missing ability to become inquisitive and curious about what I have been able to come to after so many years of persistent work.

This kind of answer makes me wonder if these geologists have knowledge enough to do what they are working with, or if this is something they say just so they don't have to discuss the subject with an amateur geologist. The Geologists themselves come out with information that the ocean plates in a geologic connection are quite young of age, only up to 200 million years old. On the other hand, the Continents are up towards 3-4 billion years old.

The reason for this is that at the Plate borders there are continual volcanic activity, and newer rock species that come forth, push the older ones farther away from these volcanic areas. This is called Ocean floor movements. We clearly see traces from this by studying the gigantic mountain chains that stretches from Tibet and up along the Eastern Asia coast to East Siberia. That these Ocean Plates continually widens we can see by also by the subduction zones (deep ocean grooves), that lies in the ocean along the Eastern Asia.

This process where the oldest rock species become pressed down against the mantel of the plates' outer sides, where they then melt and make mountain forms outside of meeting land plates where the Ocean Plates then slides under this. As before mentioned, it is not possible to find ocean floor areas that are older than 200 million years based on the process the geologists give. In comparison, the land area that I am showing, was divided up around 545 million years ago, at the time the fossils "Ediacara Biota" lived in the ocean. That is more than the double the age of the oldest ocean floor areas.

Alan Johnson, "Staatlich Geprufter Tecchniker-Geologietechnik-", tells me that the Pacific Ocean Plates have been changed around three times in these 545 million years. 

If this is due to a "HIT" from outer space, I will then suppose that the movements of the Continents must have taken place very fast in the beginning, since it pressed through the ocean floor.

The spreading by the Mid Pacific Rise in the Pacific Ocean turned out to have been formed by a spreading speed of usually 3-8 cm a year(maximum 10 cm). By the Mid Atlantic Backbone of the Atlantic Ocean, there is a spreading of 1-2cm pr. year.

There is a strong volcanic activity around most of the Pacific Ocean Plates, also called "Ildringen", where also the San Andreas Fault surround parts of this edge of the Pacific Ocean Plates. How in the world, then, should the geologists expect to find traces from the Continental Movements on this ocean floor, or fro that matter, the last one?

For this reason, this could not be a valid argument, but rather a strong indication that they do not follow the readings or accepted theories.

 

Next page: Parallel coastlines